On Wednesday 29 August 2007 16:13:10 Roman Divacky wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:03:30PM +0400, pluknet wrote: > > On 29/08/2007, Bj?rn K?nig <bkoenig_at_cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > what do you think about adding the CPU types "k9" and "k10"? These > > > processors have support for SSE3 and I noticed up to 15% faster > > > execution of CPU-intensive programs (e.g. graphics/povray) that have > > > been compiled using -march=athlon-mp -msse3. > > > > > > Regards > > > Bj?rn > > > > there will be no k9. k10 (Barcelona) is successor of k8 and expected > > to launch late in Q4 of this year(2007). > > I dont think the name matters THAT MUCH, the important thing is to support > the newer CPUs with FreeBSD infrastructure... name it "blahblah" if you > wish > not so sure about this ... specially not *this* name you suggest :) but athlon64-x2 for S940 and athlon64-am2 for sse3 capable cpus would be kind of understandable for all I think all this cpus are revision E and higher and should understand SSE3 for opterons a note in make.conf might be usefull venice as said in another mail is not clear for all people and certainly it does not appear on the box or elsewhere -- Joćo A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.brReceived on Thu Aug 30 2007 - 11:11:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:17 UTC