Travis Mikalson wrote: > If you're using compact flash for something that's constantly updated > like a ZIL, wouldn't your CF card die real quick? Probably, for constant updates to the same areas. But as you say: > Since a ZIL is not really seek-intensive, why not just offload it to its > own standard hard disk that has its write caching and all other similar > data-corrupting technologies disabled? Yes. I don't see a point writing a log that's mostly sequantially accessed on a SSD, and which probably wears the same areas on the drive. I'm more interested in loads like databases.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:24 UTC