Ivan Voras wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > >> 3762.94 real 2627.66 user 1275.78 sys >> 2465.10 real 2958.94 user 1918.64 sys >> 2262.88 real 4322.31 user 3333.58 sys > >> (2 processors with HTT) (looks like 4 processors) >> -current, sched_4bsd > > I'm possibly stating the obvious, but did you try without HTT or on a > real 4proc machine? Much of the contention might be an artifact of HTT > (e.g. HTT "logical" processor blocking when real work could be done > because the internal processor units are busy elsewhere). > > yes I just sent an email stating that. And I'm trying it again with the virtual cores turned off.Received on Thu Feb 01 2007 - 19:04:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:05 UTC