Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:53:31PM +0300, Sergey Zaharchenko wrote: > > Hello John! > > > > Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:10:12AM -0500 you wrote: > > [snip] > > > Have you tried using nfe(4)? :) > > > > Now I have, and it works just fine, thanks (I somehow thought nfe was > > specific to some platform). Why isn't it the default? Smaller range of > > hardware supported? > > > > AFAIK, nfe(4) supports more hardwares than that of nve(4). > Try overhauled nfe(4) in the following URL. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/nfe/if_nfe.c > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/nfe/if_nfereg.h > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/nfe/if_nfevar.h > > The patch fixed serveral bugs in nfe(4) and it should perform better > than nve(4). The following hardware features are supported. > o TSO > o Tx/Rx IP/TCP/UDP checksum offload > o VLAN hardware tag insertion/stripping > o Jumbo frame(up to 9100 bytes) > > It seems that the hardware supports MSI/MSI-X too but I don't have > nForce hardwares that supports MSI/MSI-X so it's hard to implement/ > experiment it. Accoring to the Shigeaki Tagashira, the author of > FreeBSD nfe(4), his hardware claims to support 8 messages. I've > checked Linux forcedeth driver to get hardware information for > MSI/MSI-X but it I cound't understand the details. :-( > I've been running into this hardlock LOR a lot recently on a TYAN 2895 (K8WE) based box. So I tried your patch to nfe on today's -current. I tried a couple of small packet ping floods to a lan neighbor under nfe and it survived. Did fine with some large NFS over TCP transfers as well. However, I'll leave it up and running to see if it keels over in the future. pci128: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib6 pci128: physical bus=128 found-> vendor=0x10de, dev=0x005e, revid=0xa3 bus=128, slot=0, func=0 class=05-80-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0006, statreg=0x00b0, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns) found-> vendor=0x10de, dev=0x00d3, revid=0xa3 bus=128, slot=1, func=0 class=05-80-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1 cmdreg=0x000f, statreg=0x00a0, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns) map[14]: type 1, range 32, base 0xd8400000, size 12, enabled found-> vendor=0x10de, dev=0x0057, revid=0xa3 bus=128, slot=10, func=0 class=06-80-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0007, statreg=0x00b0, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=0x01 (250 ns), maxlat=0x14 (5000 ns) intpin=a, irq=5 powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 map[10]: type 1, range 32, base 0xd8401000, size 12, enabled map[14]: type 4, range 32, base 0x3000, size 3, enabled pcib6: matched entry for 128.10.INTA (src \\_SB_.PCI1.LMAC:0) pci_link22: Picked IRQ 52 with weight 0 ioapic3: Changing polarity for pin 20 to high pcib6: slot 10 INTA routed to irq 52 via \\_SB_.PCI1.LMAC found-> vendor=0x10de, dev=0x005d, revid=0xa3 bus=128, slot=14, func=0 class=06-04-00, hdrtype=0x01, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0107, statreg=0x0010, cachelnsz=16 (dwords) lattimer=0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=0x04 (1000 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns) powerspec 2 supports D0 D3 current D0 MSI supports 2 messages, 64 bit pci128: <memory> at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pci128: <memory> at device 1.0 (no driver attached) nfe1: <NVIDIA nForce4 CK804 MCP9 Networking Adapter> port 0x3000-0x3007 mem 0xd8 401000-0xd8401fff irq 52 at device 10.0 on pci128 nfe1: Reserved 0x1000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xd8401000 nfe1: bpf attached e1: Ethernet address: 00:e0:81:57:d9:af miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe1 e1000phy1: <Marvell 88E1111 Gigabit PHY> PHY 1 on miibus1 e1000phy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto ioapic3: routing intpin 20 (PCI IRQ 52) to vector 57 nfe1: [MPSAFE] nfe1: [FAST] -- Mark Atkinson atkin901_at_yahoo.com (!wired)?(coffee++):(wired);Received on Wed Feb 07 2007 - 22:24:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:05 UTC