Re: additional lib error

From: Mr. Darren <darren780_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:16:12 -0800 (PST)
--- Alexander Kabaev <kabaev_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:12:51 -0800 (PST)
> "Mr. Darren" <darren780_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > --- Alexander Kabaev <kabaev_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:35:28 -0800 (PST)
> > > "Mr. Darren" <darren780_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > also a whole lot of 
> > > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ': unsupported file
> > > > layout *** Error code 1
> > > > 
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Darren
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Output of 'readelf -a
> /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.6'
> > > will explain  a lot.
> > > Could you provide one?
> > > 
> 
> The library does not appear to be special in any way
> and ELF class and
> data fields in header are reported correctly.
> ld-elf.so.1 for amd64
> platform should load it without problems, but trying
> to feed it to i386
> rtld will generate just the error you reported. So I
> think Kris'
> suggestion that you are running i386 binary which
> tries to load amd64
> library is most likely to be correct.
> 
> -- 
> Alexander Kabaev
> 
you are 100% right.  My system was a mixture of wrong
arch libs.  the binary snapshot upgrades I did didn't
seem to remove them, or upgrade properly(minimal
install).  I formated the root / and manually moved
additional /usr libs into my mounted /usr.  This has
solved the problem.  I expirienced similar problems
with ports libs.  I wiped out all of them and started
fresh.  pkg_delete -a seems to have broke,  could have
been 32 bit compiled, or dependant on 32 bit libs.  It
didn't report any 'noticable' errors.  

thanks

-Darren


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
Received on Sat Feb 17 2007 - 21:16:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:05 UTC