Re: em0+msi related panic

Hi,

Looking through source and diff of sys/dev/em/if_em.c I have noticed that

_at__at_ -275,7 +275,7 _at__at_ static void em_add_int_delay_sysctl(stru
  static poll_handler_t em_poll;
  static void    em_intr(void *);
  #else
-static void    em_intr_fast(void *);
+static int     em_intr_fast(void *);
  static void    em_add_int_process_limit(struct adapter *, const char *,
                 const char *, int *, int);
  static void    em_handle_rxtx(void *context, int pending);
_at__at_ -1307,7 +1307,7 _at__at_ em_handle_rxtx(void *context, int pendin
   *  Fast Interrupt Service routine
   *
   *********************************************************************/
-static void
+static int
  em_intr_fast(void *arg)
  {
         struct adapter  *adapter = arg;

_at__at_ -2173,8 +2174,8 _at__at_ em_allocate_intr(struct adapter *adapter

  #ifdef DEVICE_POLLING
         if (adapter->int_handler_tag == NULL && (error = 
bus_setup_intr(dev,
-           adapter->res_interrupt, INTR_TYPE_NET | INTR_MPSAFE, em_intr, adapter,
-           &adapter->int_handler_tag)) != 0) {
+           adapter->res_interrupt, INTR_TYPE_NET | INTR_MPSAFE, NULL, em_intr,
+           adapter, &adapter->int_handler_tag)) != 0) {
                 device_printf(dev, "Failed to register interrupt 
handler");
                 return (error);
         }


between revision 1.168 and 1.169 that causes panic. I have switched
em_intr_fast to be static void and order in bus_setup_intr is incorrect. 
It should be:

         if ((error = bus_setup_intr(dev, adapter->res_interrupt,
             INTR_TYPE_NET,NULL, em_intr_fast, adapter,
             &adapter->int_handler_tag)) != 0) {

not

         if ((error = bus_setup_intr(dev, adapter->res_interrupt,
             INTR_TYPE_NET, em_intr_fast,NULL  adapter,
             &adapter->int_handler_tag)) != 0) {


which causes panic when:
/boot/loader

contains:

hw.pci.enable_msi=0
hw.pci.enable_msix=0

Btw. I'm using this since msi=1 cases watchdog timeouts with em0.


Regards,
gg.