Re: ULE 2.0

On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Jeff Roberson <jroberson_at_chesapeake.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> >> One oops in my last patch.  Try this one.
> > I got following message.
> Thank you.
> I assume it booted ok after this?  I will commit something soon to address 
> it.  I want to test it more heavily first.

	Thank you.  I got following message.  Sorry I don't use latest your
	sched_ule.c.  If this issue was fixed, please wait a minute.  I'm
	compiling latest current kernel.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec
Fast IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing.
(noperiph:sym0:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered.
(noperiph:sym1:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered.
sched_priority: invalid priority 225nice 0, ticks 46194 ftick 0 ltick 45 tick pri 45
ad0: 78533MB <HDS728080PLAT20 PF2OA21B> at ata0-master UDMA100
firewire0: bus manager 2 
ad1: 238475MB <I-O DATA NAKA-HDRM 2.10.8> at ata1-master UDMA100
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

	I got 'invalid interactive priority' KASSERTion.  Sorry I didn't
	take a note.  If I reproduce it, I'll report to you.

	MY IMPRESSION:
	I don't know that ULE2.0 is faster than 4BSD.  But I feel feathery.
	Because, on make extract in big tarball, I can use my desktop
	comfortably than 4BSD.  And I can see .avi with a little stop:-)

	I'll continue to test ULE2.0.

	P.S.
	I think that 'invalid priority' message is ugly:-).  Please change
	like following patch.  This is cosmetic change.

Index: sched_ule.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c,v
retrieving revision 1.176
diff -u -r1.176 sched_ule.c
--- sched_ule.c	6 Jan 2007 02:34:23 -0000	1.176
+++ sched_ule.c	6 Jan 2007 07:12:24 -0000
_at__at_ -1057,9 +1057,9 _at__at_
 		if (!(pri >= PRI_MIN_TIMESHARE && pri <= PRI_MAX_TIMESHARE)) {
 			static int once = 1;
 			if (once) {
-				printf("sched_priority: invalid priority %d",
+				printf("sched_priority: invalid priority %d\n",
 				    pri);
-				printf("nice %d, ticks %d ftick %d ltick %d tick pri %d\n",
+				printf("nice %d, ticks %d, ftick %d, ltick %d, tick pri %d\n",
 				    td->td_proc->p_nice,
 				    td->td_sched->ts_ticks,
 				    td->td_sched->ts_ftick,