Re: ULE 2.0

From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson_at_chesapeake.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 02:58:46 -0800 (PST)
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, David Xu wrote:

> On Saturday 06 January 2007 07:46, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, David Xu wrote:
>>>> Anyway, thanks for the pointer Xu.  I may hack this up and compare it to
>>>> ULE's current balancing.
>>>
>>> Yesterday, I have tested super-smack benchmark on 2-cpu machine, ULE
>>> decreased performance about 40%, this might be a regression though.
>>
>> I just fixed a regression in the load balancer.  On my 8way opteron ULE is
>> now 22% faster than 4BSD for select-key.smack with 32 threads.  This is
>> for both KSE and libthr.  libthr is of course significantly faster
>> overall.  I believe I can improve this even more by borrowing some tricks
>> from solaris.
>>
>> Jeff
>
> I have tried it, but my dual-core Athlon X2 3800+ is locked up under stress
> testing.

Can you tell me what revision of the file and what tests you were doing?

>
> David Xu
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>
Received on Sat Jan 06 2007 - 10:00:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:04 UTC