On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:32:39AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:05:36 +0100 Divacky Roman wrote: > > > > just for fun I tried 2.6 emulatin on 2 months old current and guess what > > /compat/linux/bin/ls works... > > > can anyone confirm this behaviour? > > Hm, you are lucky (it's a current from yesterday): > ----- > %uname -a > FreeBSD tinderbox.i386.ipt.ru 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Jan 8 22:44:43 MSK 2007 bsam_at_tinderbox.i386.ipt.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > %sysctl compat.linux > compat.linux.oss_version: 198144 > compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 > compat.linux.osname: Linux > %/compat/linux/bin/ls > CVS lapack lapack.diff > ----- > > While after "compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 -> 2.4.2": > %/compat/linux/bin/ls > /compat/linux/bin/ls: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/librt.so.1: ELF file OS ABI invalid > > Is it's time to move default linux.osrelease to 2.6.16? ;-) this is extremelly strange. I am struggling now with acroread (problems with pango) but overall it looks like almost working I also tried current from August 1st (ie. before ANY of the 2.6 stuff got commited) and ls doesnt work. does anyone see any explanation for this?Received on Tue Jan 09 2007 - 20:59:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:04 UTC