Ian FREISLICH writes: > > > DUMP: finished in 12961 seconds, throughput 2095 KBytes/sec > > As a random datapoint that might or might not be related. In the > last year or so I was pontificating about how much better SCSI > was that IDE/ATA to my boss. I then did some benchmarks on my > (CURRENT) system and discovered that an old 10Gig 7.5krpm UDMA33 > disk significantly out perform some Seagate Cheatah LVD 10krpm > disks. In supplemental testing (advised by Peter Jeremy) the disk has been able to transfer(read) 25 mbytes/sec - sufficient to declare it not the bottleneck. Additional testing will happen, but dump is by far the prime suspect. > Last time I looked, ahc(4) was still under GIANT. I noticed that. Is there any sentiment for pulling it free? And how much would that help? Robert HuffReceived on Wed Jan 31 2007 - 05:25:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:05 UTC