On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 09:47:41AM +0800, Tai-hwa Liang wrote: [...] >> Though it was reviewed before destroy_dev_sched() KPI enters to the tree, >> I'd be appreciate it if you can reviewed the attached patch again. > So, this is still the problem for scsi_targ ? > > It probably make sense to postpone free of softc until all threads > finished using it. You may use destroy_dev_sched_cb() to run the > function after the device is actually destroyed. It would just call > free(). Probably; however, I did not see any code inside scsi_target.c to detach or unregister the scsi_target device. Will this cause any cdev leakage? -- Thanks, Tai-hwa LiangReceived on Sun Jul 08 2007 - 12:00:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:13 UTC