Ulf Lilleengen wrote: > Hi, > > Gvinum just got better. At least, that's what I hope. Lukas rewrote gvinum to > use a simpler and easier to handle single-thread event system, and I have been > adapting existing code to this. The result can be found in the patches here: > Nice to see gvinum get's the facelift it so desperately needed. It's unfortunate gvinum was never able to recover from the GEOM-age, until now maybe. :-) However, do you think that it's performance is affected too? Last time i tested, i was not impressed with gvinum's RAID5 performance, write speeds were very low. RAID0 and RAID1 appeared to be on par with gstripe and gmirror though. I guess gvinum is primary for people who feel comfortable with its configuration and user-interface. > Therefore, I hope many will > test this patch and help discovering bugs that otherwise would just stay there. > I will be able to test this on my new test system, coming Wedsnesday. This consists of a modern dualcore AMD 3GHz processor with 4GB RAM and 8 SATA disks. If you like, i can report my findings to the list when i'm done. Regards, VeronicaReceived on Mon Jul 09 2007 - 08:41:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:14 UTC