On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:36:02AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2007-Jul-10 19:41:48 +0400, Andrey Chernov <ache_at_nagual.pp.ru> wrote: > >To say strictly, copying somewhere is not neccessary since this way works > >too: > > > >static char *s = "PATH=/bin"; > > > >putenv(s); > > I thought the C compiler was still free to place the string into RO > memory and/or coalesce it with other strings in that case. > > Wouldn't the following be clearer (s is forced to be writable): > > static char s[] = "PATH=/bin"; > > putenv(s); This two are the same, since there is no "const", so compiler can't put static char *s into RO memory. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:14 UTC