On Friday 13 July 2007 10:25, Attilio Rao wrote: > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > If TTY was not Giant locked, you would have had an error there if another > > mutex was locked, and the problem would have been solved years ago :-) > > Not sure what you mean, but the first evidence is that you would have > explicitly drop/pickup the mutex so that you would have handled the race > not trasparently as Giant does. > Moreover, it seems that tty should be partially locked with a sleeping > primitive (sx probabilly). > If you lock a mutex first and then a sx-lock, you should get a warning, right? --HPSReceived on Fri Jul 13 2007 - 06:55:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:14 UTC