On 7/13/07, Scott Long <scottl_at_samsco.org> wrote: > Matt Reimer wrote: > > On 7/13/07, Scott Long <scottl_at_samsco.org> wrote: > >> Matt Reimer wrote: > >> > On 7/13/07, John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > >> >> On Tuesday 05 June 2007 05:22:38 pm Matt Reimer wrote: > >> >> > Once a week or so we're seeing a panic with a -current kernel built > >> >> > just before the gcc 4.2 import (maybe three weeks ago). The box > >> has a > >> >> > Supermicro X7DBE/X7DBE+ motherboard with two Xeon 5160s, 16G RAM, > >> and > >> >> > an Areca 1220 controller with eight 500G disks connected. > >> >> > > >> >> > Does this indicate that the arcmsr driver is at fault: > >> >> > > >> >> > Tracing command irq16: arcmsr0 pid 26 tid 100018 td > >> 0xffffff040fc5b000 > >> >> > cpustop_handler() at cpustop_handler+0x35 > >> >> > ipi_nmi_handler() at ipi_nmi_handler+0x2e > >> >> > trap() at trap+0x365 > >> >> > nmi_calltrap() at nmi_calltrap+0x8 > >> >> > --- trap 0x13, rip = 0xffffffff8041ab11, rsp = > >> 0xffffffffab59eff0, rbp > >> >> > = 0xffffffffac0a37d0 --- > >> >> > siocnclose() at siocnclose+0x21 > >> >> > sio_cnputc() at sio_cnputc+0x89 > >> >> > cnputc() at cnputc+0x6a > >> >> > putchar() at putchar+0x5f > >> >> > kvprintf() at kvprintf+0xd45 > >> >> > printf() at printf+0xe1 > >> >> > panic() at panic+0x145 > >> >> > xpt_done() at xpt_done+0x14a > >> >> > arcmsr_interrupt() at arcmsr_interrupt+0x2df > >> >> > ithread_loop() at ithread_loop+0x108 > >> >> > fork_exit() at fork_exit+0xaa > >> >> > fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe > >> >> > --- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0xffffffffac0a3d30, rbp = 0 --- > >> >> > >> >> Looks like it has panic'd here: > >> >> > >> >> switch (done_ccb->ccb_h.path->periph->type) { > >> >> case CAM_PERIPH_BIO: > >> >> mtx_lock(&cam_bioq_lock); > >> >> TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&cam_bioq, &done_ccb->ccb_h, > >> >> sim_links.tqe); > >> >> done_ccb->ccb_h.pinfo.index = CAM_DONEQ_INDEX; > >> >> mtx_unlock(&cam_bioq_lock); > >> >> swi_sched(cambio_ih, 0); > >> >> break; > >> >> default: > >> >> panic("unknown periph type %d", > >> >> done_ccb->ccb_h.path->periph->type); > >> >> } > >> >> > >> >> which should seem to indicate that, yes, it is a driver bug. > >> > > >> > That code in -CURRENT looks a bit different (cam_simq_lock instead of > >> > cam_bioq_lock, etc.). Is that relevant to your analysis? > >> > > >> > Matt > >> > >> The locking is different, but the problem is basically the same. Are > >> you using 7-CURRENT or 6.x? > > > > 7-CURRENT from right before the gcc upgrade. > > > > Matt > > Crud.... now that I look closer, I can definitely see the locking > problems in the driver. I think the locking will have to be completely > overhauled. Can I use you as a guinea pig for testing? Please do! What's the gist of the problem? MattReceived on Fri Jul 13 2007 - 21:38:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:14 UTC