John Baldwin wrote: > It's more that we use the filesystem's timestamp as a way to validate the > timestamp from the RTC and to do a fixup if the RTC appears to be dead. Why not use something that doesn't depend on external factors, like kernel build time (AFAIK it's embedded somewhere - at least it's written on boot)? This way people using non-UFS file systems wouldn't get bitten.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:14 UTC