> > sched_ule: > > > > -j 3 buildkernel: 13:23 > > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:38 > > -j 5 buildkernel: 12:41 > > -j 6 buildkernel: 12:47 > > > > sched_4bsd: > > -j 3 buildkernel: 11:43 > > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:02 > > > > So sched_ule seems to handle more processes slightly better than 4bsd > > albeit it does it slower. ule's sweet spot is -j 4 and 4bsd is -j 3. > > > > 4bsd vs ULE > > -j 3 buildkernel: 11:43 vs -j 3 buildkernel: 13:23 > > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:02 vs -j 4 buildkernel: 12:38 > > > ULE is always slower? In my case yes. -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner. ShakespeareReceived on Tue Jul 17 2007 - 11:36:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:14 UTC