Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0

From: Claus Guttesen <kometen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:36:28 +0200
> > sched_ule:
> >
> > -j 3 buildkernel: 13:23
> > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:38
> > -j 5 buildkernel: 12:41
> > -j 6 buildkernel: 12:47
> >
> > sched_4bsd:
> > -j 3 buildkernel: 11:43
> > -j 4 buildkernel: 12:02
> >
> > So sched_ule seems to handle more processes slightly better than 4bsd
> > albeit it does it slower. ule's sweet spot is -j 4 and 4bsd is -j 3.
> >
>
> 4bsd vs ULE
>
> -j 3 buildkernel: 11:43 vs -j 3 buildkernel: 13:23
>
> -j 4 buildkernel: 12:02 vs -j 4 buildkernel: 12:38
>
>
> ULE is always slower?

In my case yes.

-- 
regards
Claus

When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.

Shakespeare
Received on Tue Jul 17 2007 - 11:36:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:14 UTC