On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Rene Ladan wrote: > Jeff Roberson schreef: >> >> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Rene Ladan wrote: >> >>> Jeff Roberson schreef: >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/ule.diff >>>> >>>> This patch is scheduled for inclusion in 7.0. I would like anyone who >>>> cares to run it to validate that it does not create any stability or >>>> performance regression over the existing ULE. This patch replaces ULE >>>> with SCHED_SMP, which will now no longer exist as a seperate fork of >>>> ULE. >>> [..] >>> >>> I cvsupped this evening at 19:34 UTC. The new ULE scheduler works fine >>> in single-user mode (it survives "make kernel"), but when I go to >>> multi-user mode I get a "sched_add: trying to run inhibited thread" >>> panic (2 vmcores lost due to fsck :( ) >> >> Can you get me a backtrace? You can enable KDB and DDB in your kernel >> along with INVARIANTS. Just type 'tr' and record the function names >> > > I found a file #165060 in /var/lost+found . kgdb didn't eat it, but strings > could still extract the attached backtrace. In case you want to recompile > the kernel, it is compiled with -O1 -pipe -march=prescott > -fno-strict-aliasing Can you run gdb kernel.debug from your compile directory. Then type: list *(sched_switch+0x26e) I need to know the line number of that call. Thanks, Jeff > > > Regards, > Rene > -- > GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 > (subkeys.pgp.net) > > "It won't fit on the line." > -- me, 2001 > >Received on Wed Jul 18 2007 - 20:03:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:14 UTC