Hello everyone, is there any issue to replace i4b on -CURRENT with HPS one? I have had compiled these patches now for several years in my productions servers and had never issues with it. With all due respect to the authors, the current i4b looks very outdated. If HPS i4b is already GIANT-free, probably it would be a better idea to review the code and give some advices what needs to be fixed. Isdn in germany is still commonly used. I am currently installing some machines todo pf-stress-tests and could add a couple of isdn devices too if needed. Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 01 June 2007 21:19, Warner Losh wrote: > >>>> i4b - ISDN implementation >>>> >>> ... >>> >>> Before deleting we should replace i4b with the one from hps. >>> http://www.selasky.org/hans_petter/isdn4bsd/index.html >>> It was said to be GIANT free last time I asked. >>> >> Who has reviewed this code? Last time I checked, it had all kinds of >> Byzantine construts that made it extremely difficult to penetrate. >> There were very few comments and it implemented state machines as >> computed gotos :-(. The cure would be worse than the disease. >> > > When was last time? > > The code is constantly changing during the years. > > --HPS >Received on Fri Jul 20 2007 - 16:33:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:15 UTC