* Chris Dionissopoulos (dionch_at_freemail.gr) wrote: > Its an Intel c2d-6300 (see prev. messages) using cpufreq(4). > Everything works fine (for 6 months or more) with 4BSD or > ULE2/3(unpatched) scheduler. > > AFAIK, the problem Jeff trying to resolve is why a ULE3(+last patch) > kernel, produces panics when a process touches cpufreq(4) context. Yes, I don't mean to say the problem lies specifically in acpi_throttle, just that I've seen "it used to work but doesn't any more" as a result of it, and it may be worth trying. The large number and range of frequencies suggests you have it loaded, since as far as I know neither Cool'n'Quiet nor SpeedStep scale that low on their own. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst http://hur.st/Received on Mon Jul 23 2007 - 21:47:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:15 UTC