On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 12:16:59AM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > I'd like to request that some owners of non-i386/amd64 boxes to test > sys/modules/tmpfs and report if it would work correctly on other > architectures, so I will be able to determine if it is appropriate to > connect it to build on these architectures (and perhaps pick out more > bugs :) Hi, funny you should post just now. It's for i386 but I just submitted a PR about tmpfs :-) Details are in kern/114870, but basically there's an overflow problem on 32-bit systems with a large amount of swap. Here's the quick fix that I attached to the PR: === sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_vfsops.c ================================================================== --- sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_vfsops.c (revision 777) +++ sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_vfsops.c (local) _at__at_ -268,7 +268,7 _at__at_ mtx_init(&tmp->allnode_lock, "tmpfs allnode lock", NULL, MTX_DEF); tmp->tm_nodes_max = nodes; tmp->tm_nodes_inuse = 0; - tmp->tm_maxfilesize = get_swpgtotal() * PAGE_SIZE; + tmp->tm_maxfilesize = (u_int64_t)get_swpgtotal() * PAGE_SIZE; LIST_INIT(&tmp->tm_nodes_used); tmp->tm_pages_max = pages;Received on Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:42:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:15 UTC