On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 08:31:32AM +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote: > Le Friday 27 July 2007, Kris Kennaway a ?crit : > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:08:26PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > In the last episode (Jul 21), Thierry Herbelot said: > > > > with a recent -current -built yesterday), I just got a panic while > > > > rebuilding -j4 the world and portupgrading firefox. > > > > > > > > the machine is pretty much memory limited (only 320 MB of RAM), with > > > > two CPUs, running a straight GENERIC kernel, including WITNESS and > > > > INVARIANTS. > > > > > > [..] > > > > > > > the panic message is : > > > > > > > > panic: System call unlink returning with 1 locks held > > > > cpuid = 0 > > > > KDB: enter: panic > > > > [thread pid 42789 tid 100102 ] > > > > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x32: leave > > > > db> where > > > > Tracing pid 42789 tid 100102 td 0xc2ce3200 > > > > kdb_enter(c0a92bc5,0,c0ac0a31,d5457c8c,0,...) at kdb_enter+0x32 > > > > panic(c0ac0a31,c0a98f5c,1,c0a98f5c,c0b3f030,...) at panic+0x124 > > > > syscall(d5457d38) at syscall+0x46e > > > > Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x20 > > > > > > I've been seeing this, as late as on a Jul 24 kernel. Happened once > > > during the cleandir stage of a buildworld, and few more times when the > > > system was relatively idle (although it is an mrtg server so lots of > > > files are constantly created and rm'd). My system is i386 with 1GB of > > > RAM, has a ZFS root, and is SMP. I've also gotten a similar "System > > > call rename returning with 1 locks held" panic. Is there any way to > > > find out what lock is being held? I've got a couple crashdumps. > > > > It appears to be a leak in the lock counters somewhere, perhaps > > related to recursively acquired rwlocks (e.g. double increment, single > > free). I eventually disabled the check because even adding extensive > > extra debugging there was no evidence of an actual lock being leaked > > anywhere. > > > > Kris > > Hello, > > I saw the same panic once or twice since the first report (same trace, > different phases of make buildworld). > > I had vfs.zfs.zil_disable="1" in /boot/loader.conf, which I just removed. > we'll see if the stability improves. AFAIK, disabling zil remains necessary to avoid low memory deadlocks. Just remove the test or turn off INVARIANTS to disable it. KrisReceived on Sat Jul 28 2007 - 16:06:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:15 UTC