Sounds exactly like what we do, multiple queues on bonded high speed 10G interfaces On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 16:53:36 -0700 "Kip Macy" <kip.macy_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/28/07, Alexey Karagodov <karagodov_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > how can i help you? > > I'd like to understand how ALTQ is being used currently. Are there > users using it on high bandwidth interfaces? > > As currently implemented it would force serialization, increased > locking overhead, and potentially loss of locality on cards that > support multiple queues (i.e. most 10GigE cards). > > -Kip > > > > > 2007/7/29, Kip Macy <kip.macy_at_gmail.com>: > > > > > > Expanding the net a bit. > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: Kip Macy <kip.macy_at_gmail.com> > > > Date: Jul 28, 2007 2:03 PM > > > Subject: call for ALTQ users > > > To: freebsd-net <freebsd-net_at_freebsd.org> > > > > > > > > > I'm looking at extending ifnet to support multiple tx queues. It > > > appears that this will inevitably interact with ALTQ. I don't know > > > anyone using ALTQ so I need users to raise their hands to > > > eventually test prospective changes. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -Kip > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_ > > freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Sun Jul 29 2007 - 00:30:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:15 UTC