Re: glibmm exceptions broken after recent upgrades on CURRENT (debug info included)

From: Ted Faber <faber_at_ISI.EDU>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 18:50:02 -0700
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:03:12AM +0900, Alexander Nedotsukov wrote:
> Ted,
> 
> There is a problem on your side. From you backtrace I can see use of 
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 which is wrong. Most likely this points 
> out to incomplete upgrade.

First of all, I'm sure you're right; there's something wrong on my end.
I appreciate you helping me find it.

I've upgraded to  libsigc++-2.0.17_1 under the new compiler, which
installed /usr/local/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 .  gdb is reporting the
library as /usr/X11R6/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 because /usr/X11R6 is now a
symlink to /usr/local (after the upgrade) and the /usr/X11R6/lib prefix
comes before /usr/local/lib in ldconfig's search path.  They're the same
file:

hut:~$ ls -li /usr/local/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 /usr/X11R6/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0
4970046 -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  46766 May 30 21:18 /usr/X11R6/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0
4970046 -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  46766 May 30 21:18 /usr/local/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0

I believe that the library (sigc) is the most recent one, and I know
it's been g++ 4.2.0 compiled.  I've actually been through every library
in the ldd listing from my little test program and they've all been
recompiled from ports using the new compiler.

Do you have a guess what might be wrong with my libsigc++ that I haven't
tried looking for?

Thanks again for the help.


-- 
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG

Received on Thu May 31 2007 - 23:50:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC