On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:03:12AM +0900, Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: > Ted, > > There is a problem on your side. From you backtrace I can see use of > /usr/X11R6/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 which is wrong. Most likely this points > out to incomplete upgrade. First of all, I'm sure you're right; there's something wrong on my end. I appreciate you helping me find it. I've upgraded to libsigc++-2.0.17_1 under the new compiler, which installed /usr/local/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 . gdb is reporting the library as /usr/X11R6/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 because /usr/X11R6 is now a symlink to /usr/local (after the upgrade) and the /usr/X11R6/lib prefix comes before /usr/local/lib in ldconfig's search path. They're the same file: hut:~$ ls -li /usr/local/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 /usr/X11R6/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 4970046 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 46766 May 30 21:18 /usr/X11R6/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 4970046 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 46766 May 30 21:18 /usr/local/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 I believe that the library (sigc) is the most recent one, and I know it's been g++ 4.2.0 compiled. I've actually been through every library in the ldd listing from my little test program and they've all been recompiled from ports using the new compiler. Do you have a guess what might be wrong with my libsigc++ that I haven't tried looking for? Thanks again for the help. -- Ted Faber http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC