On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:40:56PM +0900, Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: > Ted Faber wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:03:12AM +0900, Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: > > > >>Ted, > >> > >>There is a problem on your side. From you backtrace I can see use of > >>/usr/X11R6/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 which is wrong. Most likely this points > >>out to incomplete upgrade. > >> > > > >First of all, I'm sure you're right; there's something wrong on my end. > >I appreciate you helping me find it. > > > >I've upgraded to libsigc++-2.0.17_1 under the new compiler, which > >installed /usr/local/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 . gdb is reporting the > >library as /usr/X11R6/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 because /usr/X11R6 is now a > >symlink to /usr/local (after the upgrade) and the /usr/X11R6/lib prefix > >comes before /usr/local/lib in ldconfig's search path. They're the same > >file: > > > Right. This was fixed only two days ago. > Anyway take a look at kan_at_'s reply. Then there is a chance that problem > you have due libsigc++ and glibmm are built with gcc 3.4 and you build > main program with gcc 4.2. This true if your ports tree is older than 24 > May when explicit gcc 3.4 requirement was relaxed. So my advise is: > cvsup, rebuild libsigc++, glibmm and try again. Wilco. Thanks! -- Ted Faber http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC