On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Doug Barton wrote: Hi, > Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: >> Hello Doug, >> >> You wrote on Sunday, June 3, 2007, 3:43:21 AM: >> >> DB> After extensive testing, I've upgraded the BIND in the base to version >> DB> 9.4.1. This version contains a lot of performance improvements, >> DB> especially for threading, so I've re-enabled it by default. >> >> Is there knobs to build bind without threads? > > I wasn't planning to add one, but if someone can show me convincing > proof that it's needed, I will be glad to do so. > > Why would you not want it to be threaded? I haven't checked which part (apart from named) might need libpthread (or equivalent). One thing comes to my mind: having installations without a thread library installed as in WITHOUT_LIBC_R= WITHOUT_LIBPTHREAD= WITHOUT_LIBTHR= (or whatever an up-to-date current would be). I remember that at least pppctl is one of the few other programs that needs a threading library in base. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeTReceived on Sun Jun 03 2007 - 07:15:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC