On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, LI Xin wrote: > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Doug Barton wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: >>>> Hello Doug, >>>> >>>> You wrote on Sunday, June 3, 2007, 3:43:21 AM: >>>> >>>> DB> After extensive testing, I've upgraded the BIND in the base to >>>> version >>>> DB> 9.4.1. This version contains a lot of performance improvements, >>>> DB> especially for threading, so I've re-enabled it by default. >>>> >>>> Is there knobs to build bind without threads? >>> >>> I wasn't planning to add one, but if someone can show me convincing >>> proof that it's needed, I will be glad to do so. >>> >>> Why would you not want it to be threaded? >> >> I haven't checked which part (apart from named) might need libpthread >> (or equivalent). One thing comes to my mind: >> having installations without a thread library installed as in >> WITHOUT_LIBC_R= >> WITHOUT_LIBPTHREAD= >> WITHOUT_LIBTHR= >> (or whatever an up-to-date current would be). >> >> I remember that at least pppctl is one of the few other programs >> that needs a threading library in base. > > I think this is somewhat OT (the original request was to build BIND > without threads support anyway), but to answer it, what about don't > letting the user to disable build of default threading library? bad idea, really bad idea. I am building lots of images without any threading library included;-) -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeTReceived on Sun Jun 03 2007 - 14:45:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC