Re: pf(4) status in 7.0-R

From: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <almarrie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:21:09 +0300
On 6/4/07, Darren Reed <darrenr_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> Note that some people have concerns about CARP being patent-encumbered
> (by Cisco) too.  Unless you know for sure if something is (or isn't)
> encumbered, don't bother speculating about what is or isn't a problem.
> If you're building a product from FreeBSD usign FreeVRRPd then you
> should have already contact'd Cisco...
>
> It's possible that lots of parts of FreeBSD are covered by patents
> and we just don't really know the full situation until someone sends
> an infringement notice and a court makes a decision.  If Micrsoft
> have patents over SMB (for example) then any implementation of smbfs
> would potentially violate that...and they are under no obligation to
> tell us.
>
> Picking on things because they're unmaintained is fine but
> speculating on patent issues is a waste of time and energy.
> Leave that to those soulless and lifeless laywer-vampire types.
>
> Darren

Kill patent and free the Revolution Technology :)


-- 
Regards,

-Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
Arab Portal
http://www.WeArab.Net/
Received on Mon Jun 04 2007 - 07:21:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC