On 6/5/07, youshi10_at_u.washington.edu <youshi10_at_u.washington.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > > On 6/4/07, Alexey Tarasov <master_at_preved.cn> wrote: > >> Hi. > >> > >> > options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler > >> > >> Try to use SCHED_ULE or SCHED_CORE. > >> > >> ::[ | | | | ]:: > >> Alexey Tarasov > >> master_at_preved.cn > > > > I thought Davidxu removed SCHED_CORE for SCHED_ULE, am I missing something? > > -- > > Regards, > > > > -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri > > Arab Portal > > http://www.WeArab.Net/ > > I think so. Try SCHED_ULE. > > -Garrett I'm using ULE now, and I see mysqld could use 104%in WCPU. But do you know why services still share the cpu0 instead of using CPU1 PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 598 mysql 16 44 0 639M 633M ucond 0 50:53 4.83% mysqld 740 services 3 44 0 54292K 51352K select 0 3:08 0.00% services I wish kernel can balance using both CORES with ULE 2.0 -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/Received on Mon Jun 04 2007 - 19:41:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC