On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Jeff Roberson wrote: > Ok folks, make sure you don't sup a snapshot from the middle of my commits > and you should have a solid working tree. > > I am going to work on the version of ule with per-cpu locks (sched_smp) a > little while longer before sending that out again. I suspect this will address > many of the scheduling related complaints and performance problems people have > had. > > Thanks, > Jeff > > On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Jeff Roberson wrote: > >> I will now begin committing threadlock. >> >> Please wait to cvsup until I send another mail. >> >> Thanks, >> Jeff >> >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Jeff Roberson wrote: >> >>> This has been up for review and testing for some time. I think it's ready >>> for prime-time. Only one new bug came up over the weekend and I believe I >>> have that fixed. >>> >>> I'm going to commit the patch in stages but the tree will not be >>> functional in between. I'm not able to break it down into several >>> functional steps but I want to leave meaningful commit messages in several >>> files. >>> >>> I will send out one more mail when I start and another when I'm done. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jeff Jeff, Thanks again and I'll be sure to burn in the new scheduling prio system on my desktop :). Cheers, -GarrettReceived on Mon Jun 04 2007 - 23:17:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC