On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> Hmm. The documentation bug was introduced recently in rev. 1.30 >> of boot0cfg.8 (and merged into RELENG_6). I've just checked on >> 4.x, 6.x, and 7.0 systems here, and /boot/mbr could never be >> accepted by boot0cfg(8) because the second signature (the "Drive" >> string) isn't there. I've Cc:ed the committer of this change. > > And then, trust PRs. I wonder how is it possible that PR got submitted, > if the example showed in it is totally bogus? Escapes me. > > So, should I back out that rev.? Crap. Incorrect notes on my part, apparently from switching between boot0cfg and fdisk. Attached is a patch. My apologies. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:12 UTC