On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:33:48PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I sent mail about this last week. Are you referring to the "ZFS on 32-bit CPUs" topic? I saw that, but lowering maxvnodes to 75000 still results in panics for me. Lowering it further works, but results in poor performance. I with there was a more quantitative way to calculate it; right now it seems like taking shots in the dark to see what works. Missed the VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX though, I'll try playing with that and see if it helps. As far as I understand most of the problem on i386 is KVA -- mostly I'm thinking if there are ways to optimize the kernel memory space. Maybe cutting back on usage of other kernel allocations by lowering some limits of things I'm not fully using. I'm not 100% sure I understand why it's a problem even with <=2GB memory. I thought the kernel had a full 2GB of address space to itself (or is the problem the 320/400M that's available for kernel malloc?). Just wild speculation, and I'm probably way off here, but would it be possible / worth it to try to teach ZFS to allocate VM objects rather than carving directly out of kernel memory? How does the FreeBSD buffer cache handle it? CraigReceived on Wed Jun 13 2007 - 17:22:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:12 UTC