Dennis Berger escreveu: > I have a backupserver running CURRENT with ZFS on a 500gb volume. > I use ssync and nfs to sync our production server, and do hourly > snapshots since 2-3 month. > It never paniced or something like that and is a lot faster than my 6.2 > box was. > regards, > -Dennis > > > Olivier Mueller wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have to setup a file storage server (non-critcal, just as secondary >> backup server) and I am wondering if would be a realistic idea to start >> using ZFS. I spent some time browsing the lists and newsgroups, and the >> status wiki page looks "good": http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS . >> The http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html page also states: >> June 2007 Start FreeBSD 7.0 Release Process, so this may also be >> a positive point about overall stability? :) >> >> It would be to store lots of data, and the FS-compression feature of ZFS >> would be quite interesting for this server. Of course I'd be glad to >> help debugging any issues I may see. >> So if you are already using ZFS in "pre-production", I would be glad for >> a short "go/no go" feedback, thanks :-) >> >> regards, >> Olivier I am running a 1TB volume at home with 92% usage, to store multimedia files, and sharing it over NFS and CIFS. I never expected failures, panics, or the previously mentioned problems which were already fixed. It has constant read access, around 9MB/s according to iostat -w1 with 20MB/s peaks. Write access is somehow low, but I did, while I was just testing, some 2GB file creation with dd(1) to check for transfers per second. Never had a problem. I will certainly go production with ZFS when 7.0-R happens. Great pjd's work. -- Patrick TracanelliReceived on Wed Jun 20 2007 - 11:44:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:12 UTC