On 6/19/07, Paolo Pisati <piso_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:58:12AM +0900, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote: > > And INTR_FILTER doesn't seem well-tested at least for > > handling of stray interrupts for filter only IRQs. > > I need the following patch to workaroung the problem. > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~simokawa/tmp/kern_intr.c-20070617.patch > > on which platform? amd64 > cause, right now, if there's a stray interrupt we disable the > irq line if the interrut disable function is hooked to > ie_disab: My patch may be wrong. But it seems too restrictive to disable the interrupt forever only one stray interrupt. Drivers could return _STRAY even if it is the source. > kern_intr.c::intr_event_handle(): > > ... > if (thread & FILTER_HANDLED) { > if (ie->ie_eoi != NULL) > ie->ie_eoi(ie->ie_source); > } else { > if (ie->ie_disab != NULL) > ie->ie_disab(ie->ie_source); > } > ... > > bye, > P. > > -- /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa \/ simokawa_at_FreeBSD.ORGReceived on Wed Jun 20 2007 - 11:51:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:12 UTC