No, I don't have NET_WITH_GIANT in the config, However, I'll try adding that in loader.conf and restart in a second. (That is, after I recompile the kernel again to make sure the errors weren't some fluke) On 6/22/07, Kip Macy <kip.macy_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > Somehow debug.mpsafenet is getting set to 0, the default is 1. Do you > have NET_WITH_GIANT in your config? > > Can you try adding > debug.mpsafenet="1" > > to your loader.conf? > > -Kip > > > > On 6/22/07, Kevin Gerry <sfpoof_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't. My loader.conf consists of: > > > > [root_at_storage ~]# cat /boot/loader.conf > > autoboot_delay="3" > > [root_at_storage ~]# > > > > and sysctl.conf- > > net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv=0 > > net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1 > > net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2 > > net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 > > net.inet.tcp.msl=7500 > > net.inet.ip.rtminexpire=2 > > - > > > > > > On 6/22/07, Kip Macy < kip.macy_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > Don't set debug.mpsafenet="0" in loader.conf . > > > > > > > > > -Kip > > > > > > On 6/22/07, Kevin Gerry <sfpoof_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Go figure... If it compile with INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT, I > get > > a > > > > core on boot with: > > > > > > > > panic: mutex Giant not owned at /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:2697 > > > > Uptime: 5s > > > > Physical memory: 1015 MB > > > > Dumping 41 MB: 26 10 > > > > > > > > #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:195 > > > > 195 pcpu.h : No such file or directory. > > > > in pcpu.h > > > > (kgdb) bt > > > > #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:195 > > > > #1 0xc0606aff in boot (howto=260) at > > /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:409 > > > > #2 0xc0606d3f in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available. > > > > ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:563 > > > > #3 0xc05fb61d in _mtx_assert (m=0xc098e9a8, what=1, file=0xc08ba898 > > > > "/usr/src/sys/net/if.c", line=2697) > > > > at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:618 > > > > #4 0xc068f437 in if_start (ifp=0xc3bb3c00) at > > /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:2697 > > > > #5 0xc06c5974 in ieee80211_send_probereq (ni=0xc3bd4000, > sa=0xc3bb84ac > > "", > > > > da=0xc087eba0 "˙˙˙˙˙˙ether_ifattach", > > > > bssid=0xc087eba0 "˙˙˙˙˙˙ether_ifattach", ssid=0xc08a4613 "", > > ssidlen=0, > > > > optie=0x0, optielen=0) > > > > at /usr/src/sys/net80211/ieee80211_output.c:1539 > > > > #6 0xc06cc2ea in scan_curchan (ic=0xc3bb822c, maxdwell=200) at > > > > /usr/src/sys/net80211/ieee80211_scan.c:651 > > > > #7 0xc06cb489 in scan_next (arg=0xc3b67000) at > > > > /usr/src/sys/net80211/ieee80211_scan.c:740 > > > > #8 0xc0617cd9 in softclock (dummy=0x0) at > > > > /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:280 > > > > #9 0xc05ecca5 in ithread_loop (arg=0xc3ab3050) at > > > > /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1036 > > > > #10 0xc05ea558 in fork_exit (callout=0xc05ecaf0 <ithread_loop>, > > > > arg=0xc3ab3050, frame=0xe25d8d38) > > > > at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:797 > > > > #11 0xc083e5f0 in fork_trampoline () at > > > > /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:205 > > > > > > > > The same kernel without -g and inv/inv_sup boots fine. > > > > > > > > Any idea here? > > > > > > > > On 6/22/07, Jeff Roberson <jroberson_at_chesapeake.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Kevin, > > > > > > > > > > Can you please compile a kernel with INVARIANTS and > INVARIANT_SUPPORT > > > > > enabled? That would help us greatly with this problem. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Attilio Rao wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Kevin Gerry wrote: > > > > > >> #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:195 > > > > > >> 195 pcpu.h: No such file or directory. > > > > > >> in pcpu.h > > > > > >> (kgdb) bt > > > > > >> #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:195 > > > > > >> #1 0xc060cb73 in boot (howto=260) at > > > > > /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:409 > > > > > >> #2 0xc060cd6f in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available. > > > > > >> ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:563 > > > > > >> #3 0xc086954c in trap_fatal (frame=0xe40d3b9c, eva=20) at > > > > > >> /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:870 > > > > > >> #4 0xc0869e8c in trap (frame=0xe40d3b9c) at > > > > > >> /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:276 > > > > > >> #5 0xc0853afb in calltrap () at > > /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:139 > > > > > >> #6 0xc063b008 in propagate_priority (td=0xc3ab5e00) at > > > > > >> /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:272 > > > > > >> #7 0xc063b989 in turnstile_wait (ts=0xc3a9e6e0, > owner=0xc3ab5e00, > > > > > >> queue=Variable "queue" is not available. > > > > > >> ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:739 > > > > > >> #8 0xc060140d in _mtx_lock_sleep (m=0xc0993228, > tid=3284357632, > > > > > opts=0, > > > > > >> file=0x0, line=0) at > > /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:395 > > > > > >> #9 0xc04decd7 in em_handle_rxtx (context=0xc3b63000, > pending=1) at > > > > > >> /usr/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c:1477 > > > > > >> #10 0xc0639e72 in taskqueue_run (queue=0xc3be1880) at > > > > > >> /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c:255 > > > > > >> #11 0xc063a04f in taskqueue_thread_loop (arg=0xc3b632ec) at > > > > > >> /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c:374 > > > > > >> #12 0xc05ee896 in fork_exit (callout=0xc0639fd0 > > > > > <taskqueue_thread_loop>, > > > > > >> arg=0xc3b632ec, frame=0xe40d3d38) > > > > > >> at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:797 > > > > > >> #13 0xc0853b70 in fork_trampoline () at > > > > > >> /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:205 > > > > > >> (kgdb) list *0xc063b008 > > > > > >> 0xc063b008 is in propagate_priority > > > > > >> (/usr/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:273). > > > > > >> 268 ts = td->td_blocked; > > > > > >> 269 MPASS(ts != NULL); > > > > > >> 270 MPASS(td->td_lock == &ts->ts_lock); > > > > > >> 271 /* Resort td on the list if needed. */ > > > > > >> 272 if (!turnstile_adjust_thread(ts, td)) { > > > > > >> 273 mtx_unlock_spin(&ts->ts_lock); > > > > > >> 274 return; > > > > > >> 275 } > > > > > >> 276 /* The thread lock is released as ts > lock > > > > > above. */ > > > > > >> 277 } > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeff can better comment on it, but for what I can see it seems > that > > > > > > ts->ts_lock is not acquired again once the new assignment from > > > > > td->td_blocked > > > > > > is done and I think it should be. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your report, > > > > > > Attilio > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > > >Received on Sat Jun 23 2007 - 03:04:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:13 UTC