On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 05:38:40PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Andrey Chernov <ache_at_nagual.pp.ru> wrote: > > I am not familiar with gcc bugs reporting system at all. Could somebody > > running 4.2.1 snapshot tells, is it already fixed, by chance? If no, could > > sumebody fill bug report to them or provide detailed instructions how to > > do that, please? > > I couldn't find a similar bug in Bugzilla (though my knowledge of GCC > internals is quite poor), so I opened a new bug: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500 Thanx! Is it safe to change flags to -O1 per your report? Any objections on the following workaround patch to -current? --- sys.mk.orig 2007-06-25 19:42:40.000000000 +0400 +++ sys.mk 2007-06-25 19:43:01.000000000 +0400 _at__at_ -35,7 +35,7 _at__at_ CFLAGS ?= -O .else CC ?= cc -CFLAGS ?= -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe +CFLAGS ?= -O1 -pipe .endif CXX ?= c++ -- http://ache.pp.ru/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:13 UTC