On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:04:59 -0600 (MDT) "M. Warner Losh" <imp_at_bsdimp.com> wrote: > In message: <20070624191345.7f08c10e.garyj_at_jennejohn.org> > Gary Jennejohn <garyj_at_jennejohn.org> writes: > : I'm using exmh with nmh on a freshly installed AMD64-current: > : 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #4: Sat Jun 23 19:29:01 CEST > : 2007 > : > : nmh uses its own version of strcasecmp() because in many cases it > : passes NULL pointers to it and must check for that. > : > : However, somehow the version in libc gets used rather than the > version : from nmh and calling e.g. repl results in a SIGSEGV because > the NULL : pointer is dereferenced. > : > : I was forced to rename the routine to nmhstrcasecmp() all over the > : place. After that repl works. > : > : My question - why isn't the version in nmh overriding the version in > : libc? Am I misunderstanding something here? > > I see exactly this too... > > Warner I remade world with -O -pipe and the error with repl went away. This was suggested by phk_at_. Seems that gcc42 is optimizing just a little bit too much away with -O2. What I now see is that exmh doesn't send out my mails, although it goes through all the motions (I see network activity). Now I'm using sylpheed, although I'd much prefer exmh. --- Gary Jennejohn / garyjATjennejohnDOTorg gjATfreebsdDOTorg garyjATdenxDOTdeReceived on Tue Jun 26 2007 - 04:34:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:13 UTC