At Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:40:13 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 04:25:29PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote: > > At Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:04:48 -0700, > > Steve Kargl wrote: > > > I suspect it is the same problem. Unfortunately, the author of > > > tcsh does not have a publicly available source tree, so one cannot > > > determine if the problem is fixed. It looks like you've managed > > > to go beyond the limited debugging I did in bin/112408. Hopefully, > > > this gets addressed before 7.0 is released. > > > > But you can consult the bug tracking system at http://bugs.gw.com/ > > > > ROTFL. > > http://bugs.gw.com/view.php?id=52 > > This URL points to http://mx.gw.com/pipermail/tcsh-bugs/2007-May/000498.html > which is due to bin/112408. Yes. I know. > I've repeatedly asked to have the import of tcsh 6.15.00 backed out to > the old 6.14.00 version. Having 7.0 released with a broken default > user shell seems to be a lack of QA. A more important question is > "can the broken signal handling in tcsh be exploited?" IMHO, a fix would be much better than backing out 6.15.00. -- Rui PauloReceived on Sat Jun 30 2007 - 13:54:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:13 UTC