>>Bsdtar should now be considerably faster than before. >>I'd appreciate any feedback ... > > The first archive was created with bsdtar (tar cvf ports.tar ports) > which made gtar bitch a bit .... Which version of gtar were you using? In my testing, there's a small but definite slowdown from gtar 1.13 to 1.15 to 1.16. > ... gtar bitch a bit about unknown options (SCHILY.*) ... bsdtar should probably warn about unknown options as well; I'll have to look into that. (It's a little tricky because libarchive is set up to only return one error for any one operation. I might have to generalize that.) Now that gtar is following standards, I wonder if they'll adopt some of the extensions developed by other people? (Such as Joerg Schilling's solid work on integrating file flags and ACL support into pax format.) Tim KientzleReceived on Sun Mar 11 2007 - 23:42:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:06 UTC