On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 01:16:34PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > >Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org> writes: > >>answering myself.. > >>comes from having options LOCK_PROFILING in my kernel. > >>adding the same to /etc/make.conf and recompiling netstat and libkvm > >>helped. > >>(not sure if both are needed) > > > >This is very bad. LOCK_PROFILING should have no visible effect on > >userland. That is precisely what xinpcb, xunpcb, xtcpcb etc. are for: > >to isolate userland from kernel structures. They should not contain > >any locks or anything else which would be affected by LOCK_PROFILING > >or other kernel options. > > > >DES > > sockstat actually told me that all those were the wrong size, so apparently > they change size too.(!?) > > I haven't gone to look at their definition yet, but as you say, it sounds > like > something was done wrong. Kip made some changes to this recently, perhaps he can comment. Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:06 UTC