On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, 10:51+0100, Harti Brandt wrote: > > Hi, > > is there any specific reason that we don't support the LOCAL_CREDS > option for SOCK_DGRAM sockets in the local domain? It's documented > in unix(4) for a long time and it looks like it is supported, for > example, in NetBSD. IIRC it is supported. >From tools/regression/sockets/unix_cmsg/README: For SOCK_DGRAM sockets: ---------------------- [...] 3: Sending cmsgcred, receiving sockcred Server creates datagram socket and set socket option LOCAL_CREDS for it. Client sends one message with data and control message with SOCK_CREDS type to Server. Server should receive one message with data and control message with SCM_CREDS type followed by struct sockcred{} and this structure should contain correct information. -- Maxim KonovalovReceived on Fri Mar 16 2007 - 11:19:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:06 UTC