On Thursday 10 May 2007 12:06, LI Xin wrote: > Patrick Dung wrote: > > Personally I think that LDAP support out of the box is good (e.g > > other OS already has LDAP support out of the box, get more users to > > use it). > > > > We already have programs like bsnmp, pam_radius, Kerberos and OPIE > > integrated/comes with the base OS. Is Openldap(client library, not > > server), nss_ldap/pam_ldap support in base OS worth more attention? > > I think that importing the whole OpenLDAP client into base system > as-is is useful, but that might be painful, because the development > pace of OpenLDAP is fast and people do want bugfixes, etc. from newer > OpenLDAP releases, so we should work carefully to avoid conflict > between base OpenLDAP and port OpenLDAP. So I think we may want what > we did for libbsdxml (expat) if we really wanted to import the stuff > into base system. IMO if pam_ldap is on the first disk of a CD it counts as "out of the box". From a user perspective it is right there and available if they want to use it. You could claim that pam_winbind should be imported too since I bet it's used in more installations than pam_ldap. As you can probably guess I am more inclined to remove things than keep them in.. :) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:09 UTC