Re: MacBook patches

From: Thomas Sparrevohn <Thomas.Sparrevohn_at_btinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 12:25:53 +0100
On Saturday 12 May 2007 19:35:07 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 19:30 +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > At Sat, 12 May 2007 14:12:42 -0400,
> > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > 
> > > [1  <text/plain (quoted-printable)>]
> > > On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 18:49 +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > > > At Fri, 11 May 2007 23:45:49 -0400,
> > > > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > > > This seems to work on my Core Duo Pro:
> > > > > 
> > > > > dev.cpu.0.temperature: 70
> > > > > dev.cpu.1.temperature: 70
> > > > 
> > > > For curiosity's sake, what's your CPU?
> > > 
> > > MacBookPro1,1 Core Duo 2.0 GHz
> > 
> > Do you have frequency scaling working?
> 
> I had it working before, but I have not fully recompiled the kernel to
> get the new freqs.  I'll update you when I do.
> 
> Joe
> 

Nice - Have you looked at using the mwait deeper C-States rather than halt? 
I think the "msr" portion looks like it will handle the entire Micro Core architecture 
- that would be really nice - Judging from the papers published by intel and from the
general discussions on the net - it seems like

a) P-States are the prefered way of reducing power
b) EIST - adds additional savings
c) ODCM - should only be used for Thermal emergencies as it does not redure the power 
d) TM2 or TM1 must be enabled but TM2 is prefered 

Would it be possible to seperate the "ACPI" part from the other "Mac patches" as I think
its of more general use?  
Received on Sun May 13 2007 - 09:25:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:10 UTC