Kris Kennaway wrote: > i.e. plain ZFS wants to use 3/4 of the *physical* RAM in the system > (or all but 1GB). i.e. if you have 16GB in your system then zfs will > try to use up to 15GB of it for caching leaving only 1GB for > everything else (kernel + userland). > > I would actually be interested to know how Solaris gets away with > this. It sounds like there must be less of a distinction between > memory allocated to the kernel and to userland, and the ability for > memory to flow between these two with some form of backpressure when > userland wants memory that is currently gobbled by up solaris ZFS. Isn't it adequately explained with Sparc being a 64-bit platform?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:10 UTC