Re: RELENG_6_2 broken on latest -HEAD

On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:13:01PM +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 09:52 -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 04:23:53PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > > On 2007-05-24 15:52, LI Xin <delphij_at_delphij.net> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > It seems that we can not build RELENG_6_2 world with -HEAD userland
> > > > anymore, after the gcc upgrade.  So the only way to build RELENG_6_2
> > > > releases is to create a chroot environment for now?
> > > 
> > > I think this was never really ``supported''.  It may work, but if it
> > > breaks nobody is going to fix it.
> > > 
> > > What *is* supported and should always work is building CURRENT on the
> > > latest RELENG_X branch.  But what you are doing is the reverse...
> > 
> > The problem is that running a tinderbox on a CURRENT host and building a
> > RELENG_X branch is often done.  I understand it's not really supported
> > but it is a very nice thing to be able to do.
> > 
> > Currently, a RELENG_6 build for a ports tinderbox running on CURRENT is
> > broken. :(
> > 
> > -- WXS
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
> 
> Isn't it the other way around? You couldn't have a tinderbox building
> for 7.0 running on a 6.2 host, but its common practise to have tinderbox
> build 6.2 packages whilst running on 7.0 host.

http://www.marcuscom.com/pipermail/tinderbox-list/2007-May/000839.html

I can reproduce this on my tinderbox host after getting the GCC upgrade.

-- WXS