Re: size of kernel after gcc4.2 upgrade

From: Ivan Voras <ivoras_at_fer.hr>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:15:34 +0200
Roman Divacky wrote:

> well.. I dont think that 60% increase of size when you are optimizing for size
> is normal. I even think its a "bug" in that sense that something wrong is set
> somewhere which causes this.
> 
> I certainly dont believe this is normal

I'm using the default make flags. In my case, it's release,
non-debugging 6-RELEASE kernel of 26 MB vs debugging kernel of 7-CURRENT
of 106 MB :)


Received on Sat May 26 2007 - 11:15:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC