On Mon, 28 May 2007 17:46:06 +0300 "Artem Naluzhny" <tut_at_nhamon.com.ua> wrote: > Hi > > # uname -a > FreeBSD tut.intra 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Mon May 21 > 19:32:01 EEST 2007 root_at_tut.intra:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TUT i386 > > # portsclean -L > ** /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/3.4.6/libgcc_s.so.1 is > shadowed by /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 <- ? > /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/3.4.6/libgcc_s.so.1 > <- gcc-3.4.6_1,1 > --> This may be an undesirable situation > Leave /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (specify -i to ask on this) > > ** /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/3.4.6/libstdc++.so.6 is > shadowed by /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 <- ? > /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/3.4.6/libstdc++.so.6 > <- gcc-3.4.6_1,1 > --> This may be an undesirable situation > Leave /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (specify -i to ask on this) > > > Should I fix this? > No. This is how it was intended to be. Our libgcc_so.1 and libstdc++.so.6 are supposed to be completely compatible with corresponding versions in ports. -- Alexander Kabaev
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC