Re: libgcc_s.so.1 and libstdc++.so.6 are shadowed (after gcc update?)

From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 11:41:01 -0400
On Mon, 28 May 2007 17:46:06 +0300
"Artem Naluzhny" <tut_at_nhamon.com.ua> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD tut.intra 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Mon May 21
> 19:32:01 EEST 2007     root_at_tut.intra:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TUT  i386
> 
> # portsclean -L
> ** /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/3.4.6/libgcc_s.so.1 is
> shadowed by /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
>         /lib/libgcc_s.so.1      <- ?
>         /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/3.4.6/libgcc_s.so.1
>  <- gcc-3.4.6_1,1
>  --> This may be an undesirable situation
> Leave /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (specify -i to ask on this)
> 
> ** /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/3.4.6/libstdc++.so.6 is
> shadowed by /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
>         /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 <- ?
>         /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/3.4.6/libstdc++.so.6
> <- gcc-3.4.6_1,1
>  --> This may be an undesirable situation
> Leave /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (specify -i to ask on this)
> 
> 
> Should I fix this?
> 

No. This is how it was intended to be. Our libgcc_so.1 and
libstdc++.so.6 are supposed to be completely compatible with
corresponding versions in ports.

-- 
Alexander Kabaev

Received on Mon May 28 2007 - 13:41:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC