On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 06:39:58PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Darren Reed <darrenr_at_freebsd.org> writes: > > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des_at_des.no> writes: > > > Remember that unlike Sun, we do not make the hardware our OS runs on, > > > nor do we write the firmware for it. > > Do you see my email address as being "_at_sun.com"? > > No, but ZFS comes from Sun, and Solaris is the only OS that can > currently boot from ZFS; therefore the comparison is germane. Solaris uses grub to boot from ZFS...I don't know how difficult that work was, but ZFS root can't be done with the old-style boot+loader on either sparc/x86. There may be implications in that for FreeBSD too. > My point is that it is a lot more difficult for us to implement ZFS > support in an OS that is intended to run on everything and the kitchen > sink, from the crappiest 486 to the latest quad-core Xeon, with all > kinds of crappy disk controllers, than it is for Sun to do the same in > Solaris, which mostly runs on hardware designed and manufactured by Sun > for the specific purpose of running Solaris. Which is why I'm using FreeBSD+ZFS rather than Solaris+ZFS :-) Maybe more layers are required in FreeBSD disk I/O subsystem to shield things like ZFS from crappy controllers? DarrenReceived on Fri May 18 2007 - 08:32:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:36 UTC