Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?

From: Ivan Voras <ivoras_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:48:50 +0100
Arne Wörner wrote:

> Not recently... And: "No"...
> IIRC they believed, that it is too much code and too complex code... Maybe that
> was the polite form of "chaotic/un-maintain-able code"... :-))

I don't remember entire discussions about geom_raid5 but I seem to
recall there was concern about its aggressive caching, possibly in the
write path, which could make recovery in case of e.g. power outage
problematic. I'm possibly mis-remembering this so feel free to ignore if
it's not relevant to your geom_raid5.
Received on Wed Nov 07 2007 - 09:46:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:21 UTC