-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Arno J. Klaassen wrote: > Xin LI <delphij_at_delphij.net> writes: > >> Arno J. Klaassen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Søren Schmidt <sos_at_deepcore.dk> writes: >>> >>>> OK, here is what I've come up with so far, however I still can't >>>> reproduce the problem no matter what I try here. >>>> >>>> Anyhow, try the attached patch on a clean releng_7 and let me know how >>>> it works out (or not). >>> bon, I tried under amd64-releng_6 (with latest MFC-ed ata-sources) >>> and no luck, though things improve : >> [snip] >> >> Just curious, is it a clean RELENG_6 with ata(4) MFC'ed, or patched with >> sos_at_'s patch? His patch will bring some invariant validation which will >> be helpful for driver debugging. > > File: ata-chipset.c Status: Locally Modified > > Working revision: 1.126.2.22 > Repository revision: 1.126.2.22 /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c,v > > File: ata-dma.c Status: Locally Modified > > Working revision: 1.137.2.3 > Repository revision: 1.137.2.3 /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-dma.c,v > > Those revisions are logged as "MFC: Sync the -HEAD state of ata(4) > back to RELENG_6, except [ .. blahblah ..]" > > I then applied, cleanly, sos_at_'s patch. I see. So this is basically the same code that RELENG_7 have plus sos_at_'s patch. Cheers, - -- Xin LI <delphij_at_delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHNOdWhcUczkLqiksRArSUAJ9GkVUWqbU8z0KBzvFSjUfUNvkyQACePE4B sZ3dQ3g384FAJRLuzi7W5z4= =5kKu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Fri Nov 09 2007 - 22:08:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:21 UTC